opensocial.*
Ich weiß, ich weiß - Web2.0, Soziale Netze, bla bla.
Aber vor allem für uns Inschinöre (*hrr*) ist es doch ganz interessant, wenn das Große “G” mit einsteigt:
Software Development Cycle
- Programmer produces code he believes is bug-free.
- Product is tested. 20 bugs are found.
- Programmer fixes 10 of the bugs and explains to the testing department that the other 10 aren’t really bugs.
- Testing department finds that five of the fixes didn’t work and discovers 15 new bugs.
- Repeat three times steps 3 and 4.
- Due to marketing pressure and an extremely premature product announcement based on overly-optimistic programming schedule, the product is released.
- Users find 137 new bugs.
- Original programmer, having cashed his royalty check, is nowhere to be found.
- Newly-assembled programming team fixes almost all of the 137 bugs, but introduce 456 new ones.
- Original programmer sends underpaid testing department a postcard from Fiji. Entire testing department quits.
- Company is bought in a hostile takeover by competitor using profits from their latest release, which had 783 bugs.
- New CEO is brought in by board of directors. He hires a programmer to redo program from scratch.
- Programmer produces code he believes is bug-free…
Symfony 2.0 ?
In der Symfony-ng ist derzeit eine interessante Diskussion am laufen, wie man denn nun den bald zu erwartenden Release als ‘Symfony 1.1′ bezeichnen sollte!
Seit dem Release von 1.0 sind nun schon 8 Monate ins Land gestrichen und 1.1 wird sehr viele Ver(änder/besser)ungen mit sich bringen, also warum so bescheiden?
Ich kann es nur unterstützen: Release it as 2.0, Fabien!
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/browse_frm/thread/a19a1b2658524242
Eines schönen Nachmittags in #symfony
Ich will ja nich parteiisch sein - aber OpenSource ist einfach nur das Paradies! 
[27.08 19:03] * bascht starts copying sfSimpleCMSPlugin to sfDoctrineSimpleCMSPlugin....
[27.08 19:03] < bascht> .oO( who cares. I got coffee... )
[27.08 19:06] < Garfield-fr> bascht: It's possible to make a config file with orm tag [propel|doctrine] and make the code into the same project
[27.08 19:08] < mahono> Garfield-fr: is that all to mix Propel with Doctrine?
[27.08 19:08] < Garfield-fr> This is for choise the ORM
[27.08 19:08] < Garfield-fr> orm: propel or orm: doctrine
[27.08 19:09] < bascht> Garfield-fr: But is it possible to have both of them?
[27.08 19:09] < Garfield-fr> And into the code sfConfig::get('xx_orm')
[27.08 19:09] < mahono> you mean for the CMS plugin?
[27.08 19:10] < Garfield-fr> I don't tested this
[27.08 19:10] < Garfield-fr> It is an idea for simplify
[27.08 19:11] < mahono> yeah
[27.08 19:11] < Garfield-fr> Because, i have 2 plugins for the same fonctionality
[27.08 19:12] < Garfield-fr> pffff
[27.08 19:12] < mahono> yes, I already posted this problem a few times on the mailing list..
[27.08 19:13] < bascht> Garfield-fr: But the problem for me is, that the propel-tasks keep reading my doctrine-yml's and vice versa. Could this be solved by two
different configs?
[27.08 19:13] < Garfield-fr> Your schema is into /config/doctrine/schema.yml ?
[27.08 19:14] < bascht> Garfield-fr: Yes
[27.08 19:14] < Garfield-fr> Zut !!!
[27.08 19:16] < bascht> But the Propel-Tasks also read the schema files from the /doctrine directories...
[27.08 19:16] < Garfield-fr> I check symfony propel task
[27.08 19:17] < DrRotmos> bascht: I have a pretty well functioning Doctrine port of SimpleCMSPlugin
[27.08 19:18] < mahono> cool
[27.08 19:18] < bascht> DrRotmos: You've ported it by yourself???
[27.08 19:18] < DrRotmos> yeah
[27.08 19:19] < bascht> DrRotmos: So, would you like to share it with us?
[27.08 19:19] < DrRotmos> although I've added some stuff, like locking, and there's still a bug
[27.08 19:19] < DrRotmos> well, yes, but I need to clean up some stuff first
[27.08 19:19] < mahono> maybe we could help with that bug
[27.08 19:20] < bascht> yepyepyep!
Auch wenn es Futter für Harald ist, aber damit gibt es bald ein neues Plugin am Symfony-Himmel.
LDAP’s abfragen…
…ist ja garnicht so schwer wie ich dachte.
Die Novell LDAP Bindings für C# einbinden,
ein fixes using Novell.Directory.Ldap; und fertig ist die Suppe.
Einzig der RFC 2254 für die Abfrage ist noch etwas kryptisch geschrieben. Das wird noch.
this.ldapConn = new LdapConnection();
ldapConn.Connect(HtwmLdap.ldapServer, HtwmLdap.ldapPort);
Und dann einfach in einer Exceptionbehandlung
LdapSearchQueue queue = ldapConn.Search (HtwmLdap.baseDN,
LdapConnection.SCOPE_ONE,
"(sn=Lehma*) | (sn=Schu*)",
null,
false,
(LdapSearchQueue) null,
(LdapSearchConstraints) null
);
liefert jedenfalls schonmal ordentlich viele Ergebnisse. (Kein Wunder, wenn man nach Lehma* und Schu* sucht.
